Put the Ed before the Tech in #EdTech.

Screen Shot 2013-05-17 at 12.01.29 PM.png
Hattie Barometer. Click to find out more.
What's the point?

This wiki seeks to:
  • Identify high-impact teaching practices, according to Hattie's Visible Learning meta-analyses
    • Give teachers direction on how these practices can be implemented or strengthened.
    • Identify tech-related tools and strategies that teachers can use to enhance these practices where appropriate.
  • Identify lower-impact teaching practices, according to Hattie's Visible Learning meta-analyses.
    • Identify tech-related tools and strategies that teachers can use to make these practices more effective.

external image visible-learning-for-teachers-by-john-hattie-book-cover.pngWhy connect this to Hattie's Visible Learning meta-analyses?
  • The work of Hattie (and Marzano et al) is a strong evidence-base for deciding on which educational interventions to deploy in our classes.
    • To identify what works well, and what needs to be enhanced
    • To help teachers improve their teaching practices based on evidence (and to "know their impact")
    • To help teachers engage in educational technologies that will allow them to have a greater impact


Find out more about Hattie's meta-analyses and 'impact size' here.
Some hey quotes from Hattie, (which can be summed up as "Know Thy Impact").
  • "What is most important is that teaching is visible to the student and learning is visible to the teacher."
  • "Teachers [should] see themselves as evaluators of their effects on students. Teachers need to use evidence-based methods to inform, change and sustain these evaluation beliefs about their effect."
  • "Visible Learning has summed up what has happened... the findings should be an invitation to change."

Who should use it and how?
  • Teachers looking to strengthen teaching practices, where tech solutions may be of help
  • Leaders seeking to help others develop their teaching practices and EdTech integration

Index: Ranking of Impact Sizes

These will link to sub-pages that:
  • Outline the intervention and the impact size
  • Identify tech-related tools that teachers can use to enhance their own practices.

Remember: almost all interventions cause learning (d>0.0). d=0.4 is the 'hinge point' - the average of all effects)
Effective strategies that can be enhanced with EdTech. Strategies that might be improved with effective use of EdTech.
Project aim: populate pages of those interventions that are high-impact, high-importance or easiest to address, then grow from there.
Effect Size
High-Impact Interventions (d=0.41 or higher)..........
("enhanced effects" have d>0.6)
..............
Effect Size
Low-Impact Interventions (d=0.4 or lower).............
(average of all effects is d=0.4)
(d=1.44)
Self-reporting grades (self-assessment and action)

(d=0.40)
Social skills programmes
(d=0.90)
Formative evaluation (formative assessment)

(d=0.40)
Reducing anxiety
(d=0.88)
Micro-teaching

(d=0.39)
Integrated curriculum programmes
(d=0.88)
Acceleration

(d=0.39)
Enrichment
(d=0.80)
Classroom behaviour

(d=0.38)
Time on task
(d=0.75)
Teacher clarity

(d=0.37)
Computer-assisted instruction
(d=0.74)
Reciprocal teaching (peer-teaching)

(d=0.34)
Frequent/ effects of testing
(d=0.73)
Feedback

(d=0.33)
Simulations
(d=0.72)
Teacher-student relationships

(d=0.31)
Inquiry-based teaching
(d=0.71)
Spaced vs mass-practice

(d=0.30)
Ability-grouping for gifted students
(d=0.69)
Meta-cognitive strategies

(d=0.29)
Use of calculators
(d=0.67)
Prior achievement

(d=0.24)
Competitive vs individualistic learning
(d=0.67)
Vocabulary programmes

(d=0.22)
Teaching test-taking
(d=0.65)
Creativity programmes

(d=0.22)
Visual/ audio-visual methods
(d=0.64)
Homework (high school)

(d=0.19)
Learning hierarchies
(d=0.64)
Self-verbalisation/ self-questioning

(d=0.18)
Web-based learning
(d=0.62)
Professional development

(d=0.15)
Problem-based learning
(d=0.61)
Problem-solving teaching

(d=0.09)
Teacher subject-matter knowledge
(d=0.60)
Phonics instruction

(d=0.09)
Distance education
(d=0.59)
Cooperative vs individualistic learning

(d=0.04)
Student control over learning
(d=0.59)
Study skills



(d=0.59)
Direct instruction



(d=0.58)
Comprehension programmes



(d=0.59)
Mastery learning



(d=0.57)
Worked examples



(d=0.57)
Concept mapping



(d=0.56)
Goals



(d=0.55)
Peer tutoring



(d=0.54)
Cooperative vs competitive learning



(d=0.53)
Classroom cohesion



(d=0.52)
Classroom management



(d=0.52)
Interactive video methods



(d=0.51)
Parental involvement



(d=0.49)
Small group learning



(d=0.48)
Concentration/ persisitence/ engagement



(d=0.47)
Early intervention



(d=0.46)
Questioning



(d=0.48)
Writing programmes



(d=0.43)
Expectations



(d=0.43)
Self-concept



(d=0.41)
Matching style of learning



Source: http://visible-learning.org/hattie-ranking-influences-effect-sizes-learning-achievement/

Many factors that teachers cannot influence in class are not included.